The most useful aspect of REVEL are the assignments that Pearson has built into the etext. As an instructor I get an account on REVEL that allows me to select from a list of assignments for each chapter in the etext. I can set up a due date for each assignment and REVEL will track each student's performance and progress on the assignments. The assignments themselves range from short quizzes covering small sections of the chapters to shared reflections on the material. The short quizzes can be taken multiple times, although correct answers diminish in value with each attempt. I really like this mastery approach. There are also quizzes that cover the entire chapter. I can select whatever type of assignment to use, covering any part of a chapter or all of it. The semester hasn't started yet so I don't know how well the analytics work, but it looks very helpful from the instructional videos.
Setting up the assignment on Pearson's REVEL website does take some time and effort, and at this point REVEL doesn't interface with our LMS (Blackboard) so I'll have to manually import the results into the LMS and my gradebook, but that looks relatively painless. But I really like the ability to control when the assignments are available so they track my course schedule.
So the idea is that students are forced to attempt the assignments I selected (I chose the section quizzes, but not the chapter-length quizzes). They can relatively easily jump to the quizzes without reading the associated material, but their performance on those quizzes will likely suffer for it. My hope is that the REVEL assignments will lead to more student engagement with the text (obviously).
Pearson
suggests that you make the REVEL assignments worth 15-35% of their final grade, but I decided that they would be worth 40% of the final grade for my class (and 40% from the in-class quizzes, and 20% from a paper assignment).
So, again, if REVEL only provided a more accessible etext, and the online assignments, I would have been very likely to adopt it. But on top of that, the cost of the REVEL package is substantially lower than the traditional bound text. I'm talking $105 for the REVEL package compared to about $240 for the bound text. With the spiraling cost of textbook (and higher education in general), I felt nearly compelled to adopt the REVEL version.
I'm pretty excited about using REVEL in my class. I promise to blog about how well it works during the semester. Stay tuned.
Thanks, Dr. Winslow. Anything that gets students to read with attention and acquisitiveness is a welcome addition to the teacher's toolbox.
ReplyDeleteI'm not yet familiar with REVEL but have used Pearson's integrated MyArtsLab for Humanities resources for both 100% online courses (initially) as well as as an enhancement for traditional classroom based courses (since I found that many features similar to those you mention here were really valuable). The MyArtsLab included an E-Text version of the regular textbook plus architectural panoramas, 'closer look' mini lectures and tours of works of art, targeted mini quizzes and other exercises, video clips, and finally a 'study plan' that involved pre- and post-testing on chapter material. In addition, each chapter contained a test bank of MC and matching question which I could select (with random ordering to make comparative cheating difficult) and essay type questions as well (which I almost always modified to require more searching explanations). After I became familiar with the Pearson hosted grading function, I found it easy to work with, and exporting grades to Blackboard was also very simple. I expect your experience with REVEL will be a qualified success, and look forward to your future comments. Good luck with it!
Great comments, Dr. Liddell! Nice to hear that Pearson is offering useful products across the curriculum. Now we need to get them to pay us for this publicity.
ReplyDelete